Administrative Decentralization: A New Framework for Improved Governance, Accountability, and Performance
نویسندگان
چکیده
Decision-makers and aid agency professionals in a number of transitional and developing countries are increasingly turning to “administrative decentralization” as a strategy for addressing a number of critical governmental needs. Foremost among these are improved governance, increased transparency and accountability, and more effective and efficient production and delivery of public goods and services. Unfortunately, currently available analytical frameworks and guidelines are not particularly helpful in assisting them to design strategies and reforms aimed at promoting these and other needs. This paper summarizes a new Framework developed by the authors that can assist governments and aid agencies in transitional and developing countries to design and implement administrative decentralization strategies and reforms. Labeled the “Administrative Design Framework,” it emerges from a lengthy exercise carried out by the authors for the United Nations in 1995-96. Annex I of the paper seeks to briefly review the problems and limitations of current frameworks and guidelines. In this regard, this paper should be read in conjunction with the authors’ earlier HIID Development Discussion on methodological problems in the decentralization literature, which is cited in the Annex. Importantly, the Annex also describes the currently dominant “Type-Function Framework,” particularly because its definitional clarity on the forms and types of decentralization are drawn upon by the authors in formulating their new Framework. A second Annex summarizes the issues involved in redefining the public sector. This Annex reviews current debates about downsizing and reengineering the public sector. Such a review is central, for administrative decentralization is essentially a strategy for rationalizing the distribution of public sector tasks held by the central government in most transitional and developing countries. John M. Cohen is an Institute Fellow at HIID. Stephen B. Peterson is a Development Associate at HIID and currently Chief-of-Party for the HIID executed USAID “Decentralization Support Project” in Ethiopia.
منابع مشابه
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DECENTRALIZATION IN HUNGARY AND SLOVAKIA, by Jean-Jacques Dethier, November 2000
This paper contrasts decentralization in Hungary, one of the most decentralized countries of Central and Eastern Europe, and in Slovakia, one of the least decentralized, during the decade of transition from socialism to market. It also draws lessons based on this experience. Has decentralization been effective? Has decentralization improved the delivery of essential services? Has it promoted ef...
متن کاملAssessment of Public Hospital Governance in Romania: Lessons From 10 Case Studies
Background The Government of Romania commissioned international technical assistance to help unpacking the causes of arrears in selected public hospitals. Emphases were placed on the governance-related determinants of the hospital performance in the context of the Romanian health system. Methods The assessment was structured around a public hospital governance framewor...
متن کاملExplanation the Functional principals of Spatial Governance in trans structure framework methodology
The emergence of decentralization approach and transfer some political authority to non-state actors has provided new actions for the management of geographical space under the name of spatial governance. The roots of the emergence of the concept of spatial governance return to the economic-political changing in the 1980s. The emergence of a decentralization approach and the transfer powers fro...
متن کاملProbing system limits: Decentralisation and local political accountability in Vietnam
Decentralization occupies an important space in debates over public-sector reform in doi moi Vietnam. This paper assesses the changing distribution of roles, responsibilities and resources across levels of government over the past decade. Vietnam is incrementally transfering greater administrative and fiscal responsibilities to the provincial level. In addition, the Communist Party is attemptin...
متن کاملLow Decision Space Means No Decentralization in Fiji; Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis”
Mohammed, North, and Ashton find that decentralization in Fiji shifted health-sector workloads from tertiary hospitals to peripheral health centres, but with little transfer of administrative authority from the centre. Decisionmaking in five functional areas analysed remains highly centralized. They surmise that the benefits of decentralization in terms of services and outcomes will be limited....
متن کامل